Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}【免费下载链接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agentsVerdict: {Confirmed | Falsified | Inconclusive}Confidence: {High (80%) | Medium (50-80%) | Low (50%)}Confirming Evidencesrc/api/users.ts:47— {发现描述}src/middleware/auth.ts:23— {发现描述}Contradicting Evidencetests/api/users.test.ts:112— {反证描述}Causal Chain (if confirmed){第一因} →{中间效应} →{可观测症状}Recommended Fix{具体代码变更及位置}Additional Notes{可能与其他假设相关的发现}[parallel-debugging/SKILL.md](https://link.gitcode.com/i/358ada0af98e6a6b4c3315afd12f7de5) 还给出了证据强度分级表这是仲裁时衡量证据质量的标尺 | 证据类型 | 强度 | 示例 | | --- | --- | --- | | Direct直接证据 | Strong | file.ts:42 处的 if (x 0) 应为 if (x 0) | | Correlational相关性 | Medium | 错误率在 commit abc123 之后上升 | | Testimonial口述 | Weak | 在我机器上是好的 | | Absence缺失性 | Variable | 代码路径中未发现 null 检查 | 置信度判定标准High80%要求多份直接证据 清晰因果链 无反证Medium50-80%为部分直接证据 合理因果链 轻微模糊点Low50%为以相关性证据为主、因果链不完整、存在反证。 ## Phase 5仲裁Arbitration 所有 investigator 报告齐备后主流程执行三步仲裁 **第一步对比各 investigator 的结论**把每个假设置于三种状态之一 - Confirmed高置信度确认 - Falsified存在反证 - Inconclusive证据不足。 **第二步对确认的假设排序**依据四项标准与 SKILL.md 的仲裁协议一致 1. 置信度High Medium Low 2. 因果链的强度 3. 支持性证据的数量 4. 是否存在反证。 参考文档给出的完整仲裁决策树All investigators reported? ├── NO → Wait for remaining reports └── YES → Count confirmed hypotheses ├── 0 confirmed │ ├── Any medium confidence? → Investigate further │ └── All low/falsified? → Generate new hypotheses ├── 1 confirmed │ └── High confidence? │ ├── YES → Declare root cause, propose fix │ └── NO → Flag as likely cause, recommend verification └── 2 confirmed └── Are they related? ├── YES → Compound issue (multiple contributing causes) └── NO → Rank by confidence, declare highest as primary即无假设被确认时继续深入或重新生成假设仅 1 个确认且高置信则宣布为根因2 个以上确认且相互关联则判定为复合问题多个共同作用的原因。 **第三步输出根因分析报告**命令规定了固定报告模板Debug Report: {error description}Root Cause (Most Likely)Hypothesis: {description}Confidence: {High/Medium/Low}Evidence: {summary with file:line citations}Causal Chain: {step-by-step from cause to symptom}Recommended Fix{specific fix with code changes}Other Hypotheses{hypothesis 2}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}{hypothesis 3}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}【免费下载链接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agents创作声明：本文部分内容由AI辅助生成（AIGC），仅供参考 Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}
Investigation Report: {Hypothesis Title}【免费下载链接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agentsVerdict: {Confirmed | Falsified | Inconclusive}Confidence: {High (80%) | Medium (50-80%) | Low (50%)}Confirming Evidencesrc/api/users.ts:47— {发现描述}src/middleware/auth.ts:23— {发现描述}Contradicting Evidencetests/api/users.test.ts:112— {反证描述}Causal Chain (if confirmed){第一因} →{中间效应} →{可观测症状}Recommended Fix{具体代码变更及位置}Additional Notes{可能与其他假设相关的发现}[parallel-debugging/SKILL.md](https://link.gitcode.com/i/358ada0af98e6a6b4c3315afd12f7de5) 还给出了证据强度分级表这是仲裁时衡量证据质量的标尺 | 证据类型 | 强度 | 示例 | | --- | --- | --- | | Direct直接证据 | Strong | file.ts:42 处的 if (x 0) 应为 if (x 0) | | Correlational相关性 | Medium | 错误率在 commit abc123 之后上升 | | Testimonial口述 | Weak | 在我机器上是好的 | | Absence缺失性 | Variable | 代码路径中未发现 null 检查 | 置信度判定标准High80%要求多份直接证据 清晰因果链 无反证Medium50-80%为部分直接证据 合理因果链 轻微模糊点Low50%为以相关性证据为主、因果链不完整、存在反证。 ## Phase 5仲裁Arbitration 所有 investigator 报告齐备后主流程执行三步仲裁 **第一步对比各 investigator 的结论**把每个假设置于三种状态之一 - Confirmed高置信度确认 - Falsified存在反证 - Inconclusive证据不足。 **第二步对确认的假设排序**依据四项标准与 SKILL.md 的仲裁协议一致 1. 置信度High Medium Low 2. 因果链的强度 3. 支持性证据的数量 4. 是否存在反证。 参考文档给出的完整仲裁决策树All investigators reported? ├── NO → Wait for remaining reports └── YES → Count confirmed hypotheses ├── 0 confirmed │ ├── Any medium confidence? → Investigate further │ └── All low/falsified? → Generate new hypotheses ├── 1 confirmed │ └── High confidence? │ ├── YES → Declare root cause, propose fix │ └── NO → Flag as likely cause, recommend verification └── 2 confirmed └── Are they related? ├── YES → Compound issue (multiple contributing causes) └── NO → Rank by confidence, declare highest as primary即无假设被确认时继续深入或重新生成假设仅 1 个确认且高置信则宣布为根因2 个以上确认且相互关联则判定为复合问题多个共同作用的原因。 **第三步输出根因分析报告**命令规定了固定报告模板Debug Report: {error description}Root Cause (Most Likely)Hypothesis: {description}Confidence: {High/Medium/Low}Evidence: {summary with file:line citations}Causal Chain: {step-by-step from cause to symptom}Recommended Fix{specific fix with code changes}Other Hypotheses{hypothesis 2}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}{hypothesis 3}: {status} — {brief evidence summary}【免费下载链接】agentsMulti-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, and Google Antigravity项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/agents24/agents创作声明：本文部分内容由AI辅助生成（AIGC），仅供参考